>"Jeßus" <none@all.org> wrote in message news:4846197d@news.x-privat.org...
>>R Flowers wrote:
>>> <allemannster@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e80542ba-60a3-41a6-948e-a20c8fe3ea3d@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>> : Also, I didn't mind the 90s episode too much. One thing I don't
>>> : understand is whehter that episode was non-canon or if it is now the
>>> : official origin of Homer and Marge. If it is canon, then I surprised
>>> : the episode was allowed to be made at all.
>>>
>>> It's my belief that the show's producers & writers think the notion of
>>> 'canon' is absurd for "The Simpsons," and this was just their way of
>>> expressing that.
>>
>> I'm going to have to ask - what does 'canon' mean in this context?
>
>1. 'canon' as in to 'canonize' - i.e., to shoot out of a canon.
allemannster@g…
Homer@NOSPAMFa…
